{"id":3210,"date":"2026-06-27T15:16:44","date_gmt":"2026-06-27T15:16:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/remote-support.space\/wordpress\/?p=3210"},"modified":"2026-06-27T15:21:55","modified_gmt":"2026-06-27T15:21:55","slug":"the-10-ev-threshold-bridging-chemistry-and-nuclear-physics-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/remote-support.space\/wordpress\/2026\/06\/27\/the-10-ev-threshold-bridging-chemistry-and-nuclear-physics-2\/","title":{"rendered":"The 10 eV Threshold: Bridging Chemistry and Nuclear Physics"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 id=\"the-10-ev-threshold-bridging-chemistry-and-nuclear-physics\" class=\"atx\">The 10 eV Threshold: Bridging Chemistry and Nuclear Physics<\/h1>\r\n<strong>By Khawar Nehal<\/strong>\r\n\r\nDate : 27 June 2026\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-3212 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/remote-support.space\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/nuclear_fusion.webp\" alt=\"\" width=\"548\" height=\"341\" srcset=\"https:\/\/remote-support.space\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/nuclear_fusion.webp 548w, https:\/\/remote-support.space\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/nuclear_fusion-300x187.webp 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 548px) 100vw, 548px\" \/>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:post-content -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\nIn the world of energy and physics, we often deal in clear binaries: on or off, true or false. But at the atomic scale, the line between chemical bonding and nuclear transformation is blurrier than mainstream textbooks suggest. For decades, I have operated on a principle of <strong>&#8220;Trust but Verify.&#8221;<\/strong> When looking at energy systems, we must verify the data, even when it challenges established dogma.\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\nThere is a persistent claim that nuclear reactions require thousands of electron volts (keV) or millions (MeV). However, experimental evidence from verified low-energy decay processes and Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR) suggests that nuclear events can be triggered or occur with inputs far lower than the traditional Coulomb barrier\u2014often in the <strong>&lt;10 eV<\/strong> range.\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\nThis article breaks down the verified highest chemical energies, the undisputed low-energy nuclear decays (including specific electron capture cases), the claimed LENR reactions, and the role of decay emissions in triggering secondary reactions.\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:separator -->\r\n\r\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:separator -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":2} -->\r\n<h2>1. The Ceiling of Standard Chemistry: Highest Chemical Reaction Energies<\/h2>\r\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\nBefore we cross into nuclear territory, we must understand the maximum energy available in standard chemical bonds. Chemical reactions involve the rearrangement of electrons, not nuclei.\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\nThe highest energy chemical reactions typically involve <strong>fluorine<\/strong> or <strong>oxygen<\/strong> reacting with highly electropositive elements like silicon, boron, or aluminum.\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:table -->\r\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\">\r\n<table>\r\n<thead>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th>Reaction<\/th>\r\n<th>Product<\/th>\r\n<th>Energy Released (kJ\/mol)<\/th>\r\n<th>Energy per Molecule (eV)<\/th>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/thead>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Si + 2F\u2082 \u2192 SiF\u2084<\/td>\r\n<td>Silicon Tetrafluoride<\/td>\r\n<td>~1,615 kJ\/mol<\/td>\r\n<td><strong>~16.7 eV<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>4Al + 3O\u2082 \u2192 2Al\u2082O\u2083<\/td>\r\n<td>Aluminum Oxide<\/td>\r\n<td>~1,675 kJ\/mol<\/td>\r\n<td><strong>~17.3 eV<\/strong> (per formula unit)<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>2B + 3F\u2082 \u2192 2BF\u2083<\/td>\r\n<td>Boron Trifluoride<\/td>\r\n<td>~1,100 kJ\/mol<\/td>\r\n<td><strong>~11.4 eV<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>H\u2082 + F\u2082 \u2192 2HF<\/td>\r\n<td>Hydrogen Fluoride<\/td>\r\n<td>~546 kJ\/mol<\/td>\r\n<td><strong>~2.8 eV<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>C + O\u2082 \u2192 CO\u2082<\/td>\r\n<td>Carbon Dioxide<\/td>\r\n<td>~393 kJ\/mol<\/td>\r\n<td><strong>~4.1 eV<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<\/figure>\r\n<!-- \/wp:table -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<strong>Key Takeaway:<\/strong> Standard chemistry tops out around <strong>17\u201318 eV<\/strong> per reaction event. If you see energy outputs significantly higher than this without corresponding mass loss or radiation consistent with fission\/fusion, you are likely looking at something else\u2014or a measurement error. But if you see <em>nuclear<\/em> products (transmutations) with only ~10 eV input, you are in LENR territory.\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:separator -->\r\n\r\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:separator -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":2} -->\r\n<h2>2. Undisputed Low-Energy Nuclear Processes (&lt;10 eV to keV)<\/h2>\r\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\nBefore discussing controversial claims, we must acknowledge nuclear processes that are scientifically accepted and occur at very low energies. These are not &#8220;reactions&#8221; in the sense of fusion, but they are nuclear events that defy the idea that all nuclear physics requires MeV energies.\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\r\n<h3>A. Nuclear Isomer Transitions (The &lt;10 eV Proof)<\/h3>\r\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\nNuclear isomers are excited states of nuclei that live for a long time. Their decay to the ground state can release very low energy, proving nuclear transitions can exist at chemical energy scales.\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:list -->\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><strong>Thorium-229 (<sup>229m<\/sup>Th):<\/strong> This is the most famous example. The transition from its isomeric state to the ground state releases only <strong>~8.3 eV<\/strong>. This is in the ultraviolet light range, blurring the line between nuclear and atomic physics. It is undisputed that this is a nuclear transition, yet it occurs at an energy level comparable to strong chemical bonds.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Uranium-235 (<sup>235m<\/sup>U):<\/strong> Has an isomeric transition at <strong>~76 eV<\/strong>.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\r\n<h3>B. Electron Capture at Low Energies<\/h3>\r\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\nElectron capture is a process where a proton-rich nucleus absorbs an inner atomic electron, changing a proton to a neutron and emitting a neutrino. While the total Q-value (mass difference) is often higher, the <strong>triggering energy<\/strong> and specific low-Q cases are critical.\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:list -->\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><strong>The Trigger Mechanism:<\/strong> The process is initiated by the presence of an electron in the K-shell or L-shell. The binding energy of these electrons is typically <strong>&lt;10 eV to ~100 keV<\/strong> depending on the element. For lighter elements involved in potential LENR scenarios (like Lithium or Beryllium), the electron binding energies are very low (e.g., Lithium K-shell is ~55 eV, but valence interactions are &lt;10 eV).<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Low Q-Value Examples:<\/strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><strong>Rhenium-187 (<sup>187<\/sup>Re):<\/strong> While primarily a beta emitter, its extremely low Q-value (<strong>~2.6 keV<\/strong>) demonstrates that nuclear mass differences can be minute. In certain ionized states or chemical environments, the rate of decay can be slightly altered, showing the link between atomic electron configuration and nuclear stability.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Beryllium-7 (<sup>7<\/sup>Be):<\/strong> Decays via electron capture to Lithium-7. The Q-value is ~862 keV, but the process is entirely dependent on the overlap of the electron wavefunction with the nucleus. In metallic environments or under high pressure, the electron density at the nucleus changes, subtly affecting the decay rate. This proves that <strong>atomic-scale conditions (eV scale pressures\/fields) influence nuclear outcomes<\/strong>.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\r\n<h3>C. Beta Decay with Extremely Low Q-Values<\/h3>\r\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:list -->\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><strong>Tritium (<sup>3<\/sup>H):<\/strong> Decays to Helium-3 with a Q-value of <strong>18.6 keV<\/strong>.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Nickel-63 (<sup>63<\/sup>Ni):<\/strong> Decays to Copper-63 with a Q-value of <strong>~67 keV<\/strong>.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\nThese undisputed examples prove that <strong>nuclear events can occur at energies far below the MeV scale<\/strong>, validating the premise that the &#8220;nuclear threshold&#8221; is not a hard wall at high energies.\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:separator -->\r\n\r\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:separator -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":2} -->\r\n<h2>3. The &lt;10 eV Nuclear Frontier: Claimed LENR Reactions<\/h2>\r\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\nMainstream physics states that overcoming the Coulomb barrier for fusion requires keV energies. However, researchers in Condensed Matter Nuclear Science argue that <strong>lattice screening, coherent phonons, and quantum tunneling<\/strong> can reduce this requirement to the <strong>1\u201310 eV<\/strong> range.\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\nHere are the primary claimed reactions where low-energy inputs (&lt;10 eV per particle) are said to trigger nuclear events:\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\r\n<h3>A. Deuterium-Deuterium Fusion to Helium-4 (The &#8220;Clean&#8221; Fusion)<\/h3>\r\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:list -->\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><strong>Reaction:<\/strong> D + D \u2192 <sup>4<\/sup>He + Heat (23.8 MeV)<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Input Energy:<\/strong> Electrolysis at 1.5\u20133 V (~1.5\u20133 eV per electron).<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Claim:<\/strong> The metal lattice (Palladium) screens the repulsion, allowing direct fusion without emitting neutrons or gamma rays. The energy is released as lattice vibrations (heat).<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Proponents:<\/strong> Fleischmann &amp; Pons, McKubre (SRI), Storms.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\r\n<h3>B. Nickel-Hydrogen Transmutation<\/h3>\r\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:list -->\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><strong>Reaction:<\/strong> <sup>58<\/sup>Ni + H \u2192 <sup>59<\/sup>Cu \u2192 <sup>59<\/sup>Ni + \u03b2\u207b (or similar pathways to Copper\/Zinc).<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Input Energy:<\/strong> Thermal activation (300\u2013600\u00b0C) + RF\/Microwave stimulation. Bulk input is thermal\/RF, but local effective energy per interaction is claimed to be &lt;10 eV due to resonance.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Claim:<\/strong> Protons tunnel into the Ni nucleus, causing transmutation and releasing heat.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Proponents:<\/strong> Rossi (E-Cat), Parkhomov (Russia), Brillouin Energy.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\r\n<h3>C. Plasma Electrolysis Discharges<\/h3>\r\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:list -->\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><strong>Reaction:<\/strong> Various transmutations in D\u2082O\/H\u2082O under high-voltage sparks.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Input Energy:<\/strong> Pulsed high voltage (kV range), but the <em>effective<\/em> energy per collision in the micro-plasma channel is debated. Some models suggest localized fields create conditions for tunneling at low effective energies.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Claim:<\/strong> Production of Tritium (<sup>3<\/sup>H), Neutrons, and exotic isotopes.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Proponents:<\/strong> Karabut, Savvatimova, Shnoll.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\r\n<h3>D. Widom-Larsen Weak Interaction Model<\/h3>\r\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:list -->\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><strong>Reaction:<\/strong> e\u207b + p \u2192 n + \u03bd\u2091 (Electron capture on protons in surface plasmons).<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Input Energy:<\/strong> RF\/Microwave excitation of surface plasmons on metal hydrides.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Claim:<\/strong> Heavy electrons in surface plasmons enable weak interactions at eV scales, creating ultra-cold neutrons that are then absorbed by nearby nuclei, causing transmutation and heat.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Proponents:<\/strong> Widom &amp; Larsen (MIT\/BU).<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:separator -->\r\n\r\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:separator -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":2} -->\r\n<h2>4. Can Decay Emissions Trigger Other Reactions?<\/h2>\r\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\nYes. This is a well-understood phenomenon in nuclear physics called <strong>Secondary Reactions<\/strong> or <strong>Activation<\/strong>.\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\nWhen a radioactive isotope decays, it emits particles (alpha, beta, neutrons) or photons (gamma). These emissions can strike other nuclei, triggering new reactions.\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\r\n<h3>Examples:<\/h3>\r\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:list {\"ordered\":true} -->\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li><strong>Neutron Activation:<\/strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>A neutron from a decay (e.g., from Cf-252) strikes a stable nucleus like <sup>59<\/sup>Co.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Reaction: <sup>59<\/sup>Co + n \u2192 <sup>60<\/sup>Co (Radioactive Cobalt).<\/li>\r\n \t<li>This is how many medical and industrial isotopes are made.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Alpha-Induced Reactions:<\/strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Alpha particles from Uranium\/Thorium decay can strike light elements like Oxygen or Fluorine.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Reaction: <sup>19<\/sup>F + \u03b1 \u2192 <sup>22<\/sup>Na + n (Historical source of neutrons).<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Gamma-Induced Photodisintegration:<\/strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>High-energy gamma rays (&gt;2.2 MeV) can break apart Deuterium.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Reaction: <sup>2<\/sup>H + \u03b3 \u2192 p + n.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\r\n<h3>In the Context of LENR:<\/h3>\r\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\nProponents argue that if LENR produces <strong>ultra-cold neutrons<\/strong> (as per Widom-Larsen), these neutrons could be captured by nearby nuclei without causing dangerous radiation, leading to <strong>transmutation chains<\/strong>. This would explain why some experiments show changes in elemental composition (e.g., Ni turning into Cu) without high-energy gamma emission.\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:separator -->\r\n\r\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:separator -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":2} -->\r\n<h2>5. Conclusion: A Call for Transparent Verification<\/h2>\r\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\nAs someone who believes in <strong>verifiable data<\/strong> and <strong>transparent outcomes<\/strong>, I believe the same rigor should apply to energy science.\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:list -->\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><strong>Chemistry<\/strong> has a hard ceiling at ~17 eV.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Undisputed Nuclear Physics<\/strong> includes transitions as low as <strong>8.3 eV<\/strong> (Th-229) and electron capture processes influenced by atomic-scale (&lt;100 eV) electron configurations.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>LENR<\/strong> claims to operate in the <strong>&lt;10 eV<\/strong> gap for fusion\/transmutation, using condensed matter effects to bypass standard barriers.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\nWhether one believes these LENR claims or not, the existence of undisputed low-energy nuclear transitions like Th-229 proves that the &#8220;nuclear world&#8221; is not exclusively high-energy. The question is not <em>if<\/em> low-energy nuclear effects are possible, but <em>how<\/em> they can be reliably reproduced and scaled.\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\nWe must not dismiss anomalies\u2014we must investigate them. Because sometimes, the next breakthrough in energy sovereignty lies in the details everyone else is too afraid to verify.\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:separator -->\r\n\r\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\r\n\r\n<!-- \/wp:separator -->\r\n\r\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\r\n\r\n<em>Khawar Nehal is the Founder of ATRC and Muftasoft. He specializes in ethical governance through the Project Equity Method\u2122 (PEM) and sustainable growth.<\/em><div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div><p id=\"pvc_stats_3210\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"3210\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" alt=\"Loading\" src=\"https:\/\/remote-support.space\/wordpress\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader-2x.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p><div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The 10 eV Threshold: Bridging Chemistry and Nuclear Physics By Khawar Nehal Date : 27 June 2026 &nbsp; &nbsp; In the world of energy and physics, we often deal in clear binaries: on or off, true or false. But at the atomic scale, the line between chemical bonding and nuclear transformation is blurrier than mainstream [&hellip;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_3210\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"3210\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" alt=\"Loading\" src=\"https:\/\/remote-support.space\/wordpress\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader-2x.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3210","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-physics"],"a3_pvc":{"activated":true,"total_views":4,"today_views":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/remote-support.space\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3210","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/remote-support.space\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/remote-support.space\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/remote-support.space\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/remote-support.space\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3210"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/remote-support.space\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3210\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3216,"href":"https:\/\/remote-support.space\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3210\/revisions\/3216"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/remote-support.space\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3210"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/remote-support.space\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3210"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/remote-support.space\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3210"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}