Remote Support LLC


Contact

Khawar Nehal’s 4 layer security model

Khawar Nehal’s 4-Layer Security Model explained

Layer 1 – Physical Security 🏢🔒

Definition:
Protecting the hardware and premises from unauthorized physical access.

Why it’s first:
If someone can physically touch the equipment (servers, routers, workstations), they can bypass all higher layers—no matter how strong your passwords or encryption are.

Key controls:

  • Locked server rooms and racks
  • Access control systems (RFID cards, biometrics, PIN pads)
  • CCTV coverage of sensitive areas
  • Guards and visitor logs
  • Tamper-evident seals on hardware
  • Secured cabling routes (avoid exposed network cables)

Failure example:
An intruder with 2 minutes of unsupervised access plugs in a USB “Rubber Ducky” and injects malicious code directly, bypassing network firewalls entirely.

They can also bypass the BIOS if they can open up the machine.

Layer 2 – Software Security 💻🛡️

Definition:
Ensuring that the code itself—operating systems, applications, firmware—is as free from all exploitable flaws. Usually possible by selecting auditable free and open source (FOSS).

Why it’s second:
Even if your server is physically safe, software with bugs can be attacked remotely.
Example: A web server running outdated WordPress can be cracked (not hacked) from anywhere in the world.

Key controls:

  • Security-focused development (secure coding practices, code reviews)
  • Using well-maintained open-source or commercial software which is patched by a serious vendor. Specifically avoid all commercial vendors that take more than a week for any patch to be made. No matter how popular they are due to the excessive advertising efforts.
  • Patch and update cycles with minimal delay
  • Vulnerability scanning. Penetrating testing is useless because the administrator needs to do layer 3.
  • Disabling or remove unnecessary software/services is NOT necessary as long as the software is updated automatically and the default settings are to deny access to outside networks.
  • Spend time and resources to replacing weak vendors not wasting resources on implementing IDS or SIEMs.
  • It is almost impossible to gain unauthorized access to any updated Linux machine since its creation in 1992.

Failure example:
A zero-day exploit in an unpatched VPN appliance allows attackers to enter the network without ever touching the building.

Layer 3 – Configuration Security ⚙️🔐

Definition:
Making sure that systems are set up correctly and hardened so that they don’t accidentally expose vulnerabilities.

Why it’s third:
You can have great software, but if it’s left in a default or misconfigured state, it can be wide open.

Key controls:

  • Strong password policies.
  • Do not allow less skilled admins to be responsible for important mission critical systems.
  • Applying principle of least privilege for accounts
  • Network segmentation (separate admin, production, and guest networks)
  • Logging and monitoring configurations
  • Disabling test accounts, sample files, and debugging interfaces

Failure example:
A database server with default “admin / admin” credentials is exposed to the internet. Even though the DB software itself is secure, the bad configuration makes it vulnerable.

Layer 4 – Social Engineering / User-Layer Security 🧠🎭

Definition:
Defending against human manipulation—phishing, baiting, pretexting, or insider misuse.

Why it’s last:
Once the tech is secure, the human element becomes the weakest link.
Most modern breaches involve some form of social engineering.

Key controls:

  • Awareness training (recognizing phishing, suspicious calls, fake invoices)
  • Role-based access control with minimal privileges
  • Temporary access windows for privileged accounts
  • Automating updates and logs to reduce need for admin logins
  • Simulated phishing campaigns to test readiness
  • Comprehensive Anti-Phishing Training Book / Counterphish : Phishing Dark Waters, Beyond the Hook

Failure example:
An attacker calls the helpdesk pretending to be a senior executive, urgently requesting a password reset to “close a million-dollar deal.” The support staff bypass procedures due to pressure.

The Core Principle – Sequence Matters 🔄

Khawar Nehal’s model emphasizes order:

  1. Physical security must come first—because without it, nothing else holds.
  2. Software security ensures the code base is strong.
  3. Configuration security ensures the environment is hardened.
  4. Social engineering defense ensures the people running it aren’t tricked.

If you skip one, the higher layers become ineffective.
Example: If Layer 1 is broken, Layer 4 doesn’t matter—attackers can just take the hard drive.

Applied Example – Securing a Server 💼

 

Layer 1 – Physical Security 🏢🔒

Failure example:
An attacker gains access to the unlocked server room during lunch hours. They connect a portable drive to a backup server, copy sensitive company data, and leave within three minutes. No alarms or alerts are triggered because there’s no access control or CCTV monitoring.

Layer 2 – Software Security 💻🛡️

Failure example:
A public-facing HR portal is running outdated software with a known vulnerability. An attacker exploits the flaw remotely to bypass authentication, downloading payroll data for the past five years—without ever stepping into the building.

Layer 3 – Configuration Security ⚙️🔐

Failure example:
A newly deployed database server is left with its default “admin / admin” credentials and open to the internet. Within hours, automated bots find it, log in, and encrypt all stored data for ransom.

Layer 4 – Social Engineering / User-Layer Security 🧠🎭

Failure example:
An employee receives an urgent email that appears to be from the CEO, asking them to log in and approve a “confidential contract.” The link leads to a convincing fake login page. The employee enters their real credentials, unknowingly handing attackers full access to corporate email, Teams chats, and internal documents.

 

Comparison with other models

 

Khawar Nehal’s 4-Layer Security Model is unique in its practical sequence, but it’s conceptually related to several other layered security approaches that have been around in cybersecurity and risk management.

Here are the main ones that overlap or complement it:

1. Defense in Depth (DiD) 🛡️🛡️🛡️

  • Origin: U.S. military strategy, adapted to cybersecurity by NIST and others.

  • Core idea: Multiple, overlapping security controls so that if one fails, others still protect the asset.

  • Layers may include: Physical security, network security, host security, application security, data security, and user awareness.

  • Difference from KN’s model:

    • DiD can have many more than four layers and doesn’t insist on a strict order of dependency.

    • KN’s model puts order at the center — you secure physical first, then software, then configuration, then people.

2. The OSI Security Layer Analogy 🌐

  • Origin: Based on the OSI networking model (7 layers) but applied metaphorically to security.

  • Example mapping:

    1. Physical layer → Physical security

    2. Data link / Network → Network security

    3. Transport → Secure protocols

    4. Application → Software security

    5. User layer → Training and awareness

  • Difference from KN’s model:

    • OSI-based security layers are aligned to network stack architecture, not operational security order.

3. CIS Controls Implementation Groups (IG1–IG3) 🔍

  • Origin: Center for Internet Security’s prioritized best practices.

  • Core:

    • IG1: Basic cyber hygiene (hardware/software inventory, controlled use, vulnerability management)

    • IG2: Advanced security processes (data protection, monitoring, controlled admin privileges)

    • IG3: Full enterprise protection (penetration testing, red-teaming, advanced detection)

  • Difference from KN’s model:

    • CIS Controls are a checklist-based maturity framework, not a conceptual “must secure in this order” structure.

4. NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 🏛️

  • Functions: Identify → Protect → Detect → Respond → Recover

  • Scope: Covers policies, technology, processes, and people.

  • Difference from KN’s model:

    • NIST CSF is process lifecycle oriented; KN’s model is layered hierarchy oriented.

5. The Onion Model of Security 🧅

  • Core:

    • Visual metaphor where security is like an onion—peel away one layer and another is there.

    • Layers can be physical, technical, and administrative controls.

  • Difference from KN’s model:

    • Onion model doesn’t specify the exact order you must secure them; KN’s does.

Where KN’s Model Stands Out

  • Strict dependency order: Physical → Software → Configuration → Human.

  • Operational focus: Designed for real-world, small-to-large IT environments, not just compliance or theory.

  • Bridging technical & human factors: Many models treat “people” as just one control; KN’s makes it the final barrier.

 

Comparison table showing Khawar Nehal’s 4-Layer Security Model against other well-known security frameworks.

 

Aspect Khawar Nehal’s 4 Layers Defense in Depth (DiD) NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) CIS Controls (IG1–IG3)
Origin Developed by Khawar Nehal as part of “Real Security” training. Military concept adapted to IT security. Developed by NIST for U.S. critical infrastructure. Center for Internet Security best-practice guide.
Primary Focus Sequential, dependency-based layering from physical to human. Multiple overlapping protections at all levels. Continuous risk management process. Prioritized security controls in maturity stages.
Layer/Step 1 Physical Security – Control physical access to systems. Physical security is one of many layers; order not strict. Identify – Know assets, risks, and resources. IG1 – Inventory of hardware/software.
Layer/Step 2 Software Security – Ensure code and applications are secure. Includes application and OS hardening but not always second. Protect – Implement safeguards. IG1 – Secure configurations & vulnerability management.
Layer/Step 3 Configuration Security – Harden systems, limit exposure. Configuration controls spread across multiple layers. Detect – Identify anomalies and incidents. IG2 – Advanced data protection & monitoring.
Layer/Step 4 Social Engineering / User Security – Minimize human exploit risk. User awareness is one layer among many. Respond & Recover – Incident handling and recovery. IG3 – Full enterprise protection, red-teaming.
Order Importance Critical – Must secure each layer before the next. Not strict – layers can be built in any sequence. Sequential functions, but cyclical process. Increasing maturity levels over time.
Human Factor Final barrier; access minimization + awareness. One of several layers, usually equal weight to others. Embedded in Protect and Respond functions. Included at all IG levels.
Visual Model 4 stacked layers in dependency order. Onion or concentric circle metaphor. 5 process functions in a loop. 18 grouped controls in priority tiers.
Unique Strength Simplicity + strict dependency logic for small/medium environments. Broad coverage, adaptable to any environment. Policy/process integration with technology. Actionable, checklist-driven controls.
Best Use Case Training, awareness, and practical security rollout. Enterprise defense planning. Compliance, governance, and risk management. Technical security program building.