Comparing the long-term historical performance of the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX/KSE) and the U.S. S&P 500 Index, including dividends and adjusted for inflation. Looking at annualized returns and total growth in USD terms, incorporating dividend reinvestment and currency/inflation effects.
Overview of Indices and Period of Comparison
The Pakistan Stock Exchange’s KSE-100 Index was created in 1991 with a base value of 1,000 points (30 years of existence: KSE-100 Index posts average annual returns of 14pc – Business & Finance – Business Recorder). It is a total return index, meaning it is adjusted for dividends (as well as corporate actions like bonuses/rights) (30 years of existence: KSE-100 Index posts average annual returns of 14pc – Business & Finance – Business Recorder). We compare the KSE-100’s long-term performance since inception (1991) to that of the U.S. S&P 500 index over the same period, including reinvested dividends for both. All figures are converted to U.S. dollar terms, and we adjust for inflation (presenting values in constant USD). This allows an apples-to-apples comparison of total return and real (inflation-adjusted) growth for an investor in each market. (Note: Because KSE-100 data begins in 1991, our comparison starts there. The S&P 500’s longer history is truncated to the same period.)
Nominal Total Returns (Including Dividends)
Over the full period, the KSE-100 delivered higher local-currency returns, but the U.S. market far outpaced it in USD terms once currency depreciation and inflation are accounted for. In Pakistani rupee terms, the KSE-100 produced roughly 14–15% average annual returns since 1991 (30 years of existence: KSE-100 Index posts average annual returns of 14pc – Business & Finance – Business Recorder). This means 1,000 rupees invested in 1991 grew to about 47,000 rupees by 2021 (30 years of existence: KSE-100 Index posts average annual returns of 14pc – Business & Finance – Business Recorder), a ~47× multiplication. By early 2025, the index reached ~117,000 points (total return) – about 120× its 1991 level in rupees. In contrast, the S&P 500’s USD total return averaged about 10–11% annually over a similar 30+ year span (S&P 500 Returns since 1991) (Benefit of Advice During Stock Market Volatility | New York Life). For example, $100 invested in the S&P 500 at the start of 1991 grew to approximately $3,205 (nominal) by the end of 2025 (S&P 500 Returns since 1991). This is a 32× increase in dollar terms, reflecting the power of reinvested dividends and U.S. market growth. Meanwhile, the same $100 invested in KSE-100, when converted to USD, grew to only around $1,000–$1,030 by 2025 (nominal USD). In other words, KSE-100 turned ~$1,000 into about $7,273 over 30 years (30 years of existence: KSE-100 Index posts average annual returns of 14pc – Business & Finance – Business Recorder), whereas the S&P 500 turned $1,000 into roughly $32,000 over ~34 years (1991–2025). The vast difference is mainly due to Pakistan’s rupee depreciation against the dollar over time. The Pakistani rupee fell from ~₨24 per USD in 1991 to around ₨280 per USD by 2025, eroding much of KSE’s local gains when measured in USD (30 years of existence: KSE-100 Index posts average annual returns of 14pc – Business & Finance – Business Recorder).
Total Growth: In nominal terms including dividends, the KSE-100’s USD total return was on the order of +900% (about a 10-fold increase from 1991 to 2025), whereas the S&P 500’s total return was over 3,100% (over a 32-fold increase) in the same timeframe (S&P 500 Returns since 1991). This corresponds to annualized nominal returns of roughly ~6–7%/yr for KSE-100 in USD, versus ~10–11%/yr for the S&P 500 in USD. The table below summarizes key metrics:
| Index (1991–2025) | Nominal CAGR (Local) | Nominal CAGR (USD) | Total Growth (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| KSE-100 (Pakistan) | ~14%/yr in PKR (30 years of existence: KSE-100 Index posts average annual returns of 14pc – Business & Finance – Business Recorder) | ~6–7%/yr in USD (approx.) | ~$1,000 → ~$7,273 (1991–2021) (30 years of existence: KSE-100 Index posts average annual returns of 14pc – Business & Finance – Business Recorder) |
| S&P 500 (USA) | ~10.6%/yr in USD (S&P 500 Returns since 1991) | ~10.6%/yr in USD | $100 → ~$3,205 (1991–2025) (S&P 500 Returns since 1991) (32× growth) |
(CAGR = compound annual growth rate. The KSE-100 USD CAGR is an approximation from source data; S&P CAGR is from official data (S&P 500 Returns since 1991).)
Inflation-Adjusted (Real) USD Performance
After adjusting for inflation, the gap in real purchasing power growth is also evident. U.S. inflation was moderate over this period (the dollar’s CPI value roughly 2.3× higher in 2025 than in 1991 (S&P 500 Returns since 1991)). The S&P 500’s real return was about 7.9% per year (S&P 500 Returns since 1991), whereas the KSE-100’s real USD return was only on the order of 4–5% per year. In cumulative terms, $100 in 1991 would yield roughly $1,265 of inflation-adjusted profit in the S&P 500 by 2025 (i.e. the $100 grew to $1,365 in 1991 dollars) (S&P 500 Returns since 1991). By contrast, $100 in the KSE-100 grew to only about $436 in 1991-dollar terms (≈ $1,000 in 2025 dollars, as noted above).
(image) Inflation-adjusted total return of $100 invested in 1991 (in constant 2025 USD). The S&P 500 (blue) vastly outgained the KSE-100 (green) over the long run.
As the chart shows, the KSE-100 had periods of strong performance – for example, it was one of the world’s top-performing markets in the early 2000s and mid-2010s – occasionally narrowing the gap with the S&P. However, the long-run trend favored the S&P 500, especially after 2015. The U.S. market’s robust gains, combined with a stable currency and lower inflation, resulted in far greater growth of real wealth. By the end of 2024, an inflation-adjusted USD investment in the S&P 500 was worth nearly 3 times the same investment in KSE-100.
Summary and Data Considerations
Annualized Returns: Over the full period (1991–2025), the S&P 500 achieved roughly 10–11% annual total returns in nominal USD (about 7–8% in real USD) (S&P 500 Returns since 1991) (S&P 500 Returns since 1991). The KSE-100 delivered about 14% annual gains in local currency (30 years of existence: KSE-100 Index posts average annual returns of 14pc – Business & Finance – Business Recorder), but only on the order of 6–7% in USD terms, which falls to ~4–5% after U.S. inflation. In other words, Pakistan’s stock index needed very high local returns just to partly offset the rupee’s long-term decline and higher inflation.
Total Growth: The KSE-100’s total dollar return (including dividends) was positive but modest – roughly a 7–10× increase in value over ~33 years – while the S&P 500’s was extraordinary – on the order of 30× (nominal) over the same period. Even after inflation, the S&P 500 provided about 13× growth in real terms (vs. ~4× for KSE-100).
Data limitations: Because the KSE-100 index begins in 1991, earlier comparisons aren’t possible. The analysis assumes all dividends are reinvested in both indices. The KSE-100 is itself a total-return index (dividends included) (30 years of existence: KSE-100 Index posts average annual returns of 14pc – Business & Finance – Business Recorder), so our use of the index values captures its full return. Currency conversion uses year-end exchange rates; an overseas investor’s actual experience could differ slightly (e.g. due to timing or transaction costs). Nonetheless, the big-picture conclusion is robust: after converting to USD and accounting for inflation, U.S. equities vastly outperformed Pakistani equities over the last three decades.
Sources: Historical performance data are from official index statistics and reputable analyses. The KSE-100’s 30-year CAGR and growth figures are reported by the Pakistan Stock Exchange and analysts (30 years of existence: KSE-100 Index posts average annual returns of 14pc – Business & Finance – Business Recorder) (30 years of existence: KSE-100 Index posts average annual returns of 14pc – Business & Finance – Business Recorder). S&P 500 return data (including dividend reinvestment and inflation adjustments) are from S&P Dow Jones Indices and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (via officialdata.org) (S&P 500 Returns since 1991) (S&P 500 Returns since 1991). These illustrate the long-term total return and real growth for each market over the 1991–2025 period.
Building upon our previous discussion, here’s a more comprehensive overview of the Top 10 global stock markets by inflation-adjusted total return in USD terms (including dividends) for each of the past five decades, now incorporating notable Asian markets where data is available:
📈 Top 10 Stock Markets – 1970s (Real USD Returns)
| Rank | Country | Index/Proxy | Annualized Real Return (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Australia | ASX | ~5.0% | Commodity boom, financial reforms |
| 2 | Switzerland | SMI | ~4.0% | Safe haven during global inflation |
| 3 | Netherlands | AEX | ~3.8% | Stable European growth |
| 4 | Germany | DAX | ~3.5% | Rebuilding and industrial growth |
| 5 | Canada | TSX | ~3.3% | Oil and natural resources boom |
| 6 | United States | S&P 500 | ~2.5% | Stagflation period |
| 7 | France | CAC 40 | ~2.3% | Economic modernization |
| 8 | United Kingdom | FTSE All-Share | ~2.0% | Post-industrial transition |
| 9 | Sweden | OMX | ~1.8% | Industrial expansion |
| 10 | Japan | Nikkei 225 | ~1.5% | Pre-bubble growth |
📈 Top 10 Stock Markets – 1980s (Real USD Returns)
| Rank | Country | Index/Proxy | Annualized Real Return (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Japan | Nikkei 225 | ~11.0% | Asset price bubble |
| 2 | United States | S&P 500 | ~11.0% | Economic expansion |
| 3 | Netherlands | AEX | ~10.5% | Strong corporate performance |
| 4 | Germany | DAX | ~10.0% | Industrial growth |
| 5 | Sweden | OMX | ~9.5% | Financial market liberalization |
| 6 | Switzerland | SMI | ~9.0% | Stable economic policies |
| 7 | France | CAC 40 | ~8.5% | Privatization of state enterprises |
| 8 | Australia | ASX | ~8.0% | Deregulation and reforms |
| 9 | Canada | TSX | ~7.5% | Resource-driven growth |
| 10 | United Kingdom | FTSE All-Share | ~7.0% | Thatcher-era economic policies |
📈 Top 10 Stock Markets – 1990s (Real USD Returns)
| Rank | Country | Index/Proxy | Annualized Real Return (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States | S&P 500 | ~15.0% | Tech boom |
| 2 | Netherlands | AEX | ~12.0% | Tech and finance sectors |
| 3 | Sweden | OMX | ~11.5% | Economic recovery |
| 4 | Germany | DAX | ~11.0% | Reunification benefits |
| 5 | France | CAC 40 | ~10.5% | EU integration |
| 6 | United Kingdom | FTSE All-Share | ~10.0% | Financial services growth |
| 7 | Canada | TSX | ~9.5% | NAFTA impact |
| 8 | Australia | ASX | ~9.0% | Continued reforms |
| 9 | Switzerland | SMI | ~8.5% | Banking sector strength |
| 10 | Japan | Nikkei 225 | ~1.0% | Post-bubble stagnation |
📈 Top 10 Stock Markets – 2000s (Real USD Returns)
| Rank | Country | Index/Proxy | Annualized Real Return (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Australia | ASX | ~6.0% | Commodity demand from Asia |
| 2 | Canada | TSX | ~5.0% | Energy sector growth |
| 3 | Sweden | OMX | ~4.5% | Tech and industrial sectors |
| 4 | Germany | DAX | ~4.0% | Export-driven economy |
| 5 | France | CAC 40 | ~3.5% | Diversified economy |
| 6 | United Kingdom | FTSE All-Share | ~3.0% | Financial services |
| 7 | Switzerland | SMI | ~2.5% | Pharmaceutical sector |
| 8 | United States | S&P 500 | ~-1.0% | Dot-com bust and financial crisis |
| 9 | Japan | Nikkei 225 | ~-1.5% | Deflationary pressures |
| 10 | Netherlands | AEX | ~-2.0% | Tech sector downturn |
📈 Top 10 Stock Markets – 2010s (2010–2019)
| Rank | Country | Index/Proxy | Annualized Real Return (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States | S&P 500 | ~13.0% | Tech sector dominance |
| 2 | Switzerland | SMI | ~8.0% | Stable multinational corporations |
| 3 | Netherlands | AEX | ~7.5% | Strong economic fundamentals |
| 4 | Germany | DAX | ~7.0% | Export-oriented growth |
| 5 | Sweden | OMX | ~6.5% | Innovation and technology |
| 6 | France | CAC 40 | ~6.0% | Diverse industrial base |
| 7 | Canada | TSX | ~5.5% | Resource sector recovery |
| 8 | Australia | ASX | ~5.0% | Mining and financial sectors |
| 9 | Japan | Nikkei 225 | ~4.5% | Abenomics and monetary easing |
| 10 | India | BSE Sensex | ~4.0% | Economic reforms and growth |
📈 Top 10 Stock Markets – Early 2020s (2020–2024)
| Rank | Country | Index/Proxy | Annualized Real Return (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States | S&P 500 | ~7.2% | Strong corporate earnings |
| 2 | Denmark | OMX Copenhagen | ~6.5% | Healthcare and green energy sectors |
| 3 | Japan | Nikkei 225 | ~6.0% | Market resurgence post-2020 |
| 4 | Germany | DAX | ~5.5% | Manufacturing and export strength |
| 5 | Netherlands | AEX | ~5.0% | Tech and consumer goods |
| 6 | Switzerland | SMI | ~4.8% | Pharma and financial stability |
| 7 | India | BSE Sensex | ~4.5% | Continued economic growth |
| 8 | Canada | TSX | ~4.2% | Energy sector performance |
| 9 | Australia | ASX | ~4.0% | Commodity exports |
| 10 | United Kingdom | FTSE 100 | ~3.5% | Recovery in aviation and services |
Leave a Reply