F-22 Raptor

---

F-22 Raptor Overview

• Role: 5th-generation air superiority stealth fighter
• Manufacturer: Lockheed Martin (with Boeing)
• First Flight: 1997 | Service Entry: 2005
• Retirement: Production ended in 2011 (187 units built).
• Unit Cost:
  • F-22A (Production): ~150–350 million (depending on R&D allocation)
  • Modern Equivalent: Estimated $400M+ if produced today (inflation, tech upgrades).

---

F-22 Specifications (F-22A Standard)

Category	Details
Length	62 ft 1 in (18.9 m)
Wingspan	44 ft 6 in (13.6 m)
Height	16 ft 8 in (5.1 m)
Empty Weight	43,340 lb (19,700 kg)
Max Takeoff Weight	83,500 lb (38,000 kg)
Engines	2× Pratt & Whitney F119-PW-100 (thrust vectoring)
Thrust	35,000 lbf (156 kN) each
Max Speed	Mach 2.25 (~1,500 mph / 2,414 km/h)
Combat Range	~530 mi (850 km) (supercruise: Mach 1.5+)
Ferry Range	1,840 mi (2,960 km) with external tanks
Ceiling	65,000 ft (20,000 m)
Stealth	Radar cross-section ~0.0001 m² (marble-sized)
Armament	Internal bays: 6× AIM-120 AMRAAM + 2× AIM-9 Sidewinder Optional: 2× 1,000-lb JDAMs or 8× SDBs

---

F-22 Variants

1. F-22A (Operational):
   • Only production model.
   • Upgraded with modern avionics (AESA radar, EW suites).
2. YF-22 (Prototype):
   • Demonstrated stealth/agility (1990s).
   • Cost: ~$150M per prototype (1990 USD).
3. Proposed/Never Built:
   • FB-22: Strike bomber variant (canceled).
   • F-22B: Twin-seat trainer (canceled).

---

Why So Expensive?

• Stealth Tech: Coatings, radar-absorbent materials.
• Avionics: AN/APG-77 AESA radar, sensor fusion.
• Thrust Vectoring: Unmatched dogfighting agility.
• Low Production: High per-unit cost due to small fleet.

---

Comparisons

• F-35 Lightning II: ~$80M (less agile, multirole focus).
• Su-57 (Russia): ~40–60M (less stealthy, export-restricted).
• Chengdu J-20 (China): ~$110M (stealth claims unverified).

---

Current Status

• U.S. Only: Never exported (ITAR restrictions).
• Upgrades: $7B program (2020–2030) to extend service life to 2060.

🛠️ F-22 Raptor: Ultimate Technical Breakdown

🔧 Powerplant & Performance

• Engines:
  • Pratt & Whitney F119-PW-100
  • Thrust: 35,000 lbf (156 kN) per engine with afterburner
  • Supercruise: Sustains Mach 1.82 (1,200 mph/1,930 km/h) without afterburners (classified testing achieved Mach 1.9+)
  • Thrust Vectoring: ±20° pitch authority in dogfights (enables “Pugachev’s Cobra” maneuvers)
  • Fuel Capacity: 18,000 lb (8,200 kg) internal + optional 2× 600-gal external tanks (rarely used, compromises stealth)

🎯 Avionics & Sensor Fusion

• AN/APG-77 AESA Radar:
  • Range: 125–150 nmi (230–280 km) vs. 1 m² targets (estimated)
  • Features: LPI (Low Probability of Intercept), tracks 30+ targets while engaging 6 simultaneously
• AN/ALR-94 EW Suite:
  • Detection: 250+ nmi (460 km) radar warning receiver (RWR)
  • Jamming: Can spoof missiles by emulating other aircraft signatures
• Infra-Red Search & Track (IRST): Later blocks added IRST pods (classified specs)

🛡️ Stealth Enhancements

• RCS Reduction:
  • 0.0001 m² frontal aspect (equivalent to a bumblebee)
  • Serpentine inlet ducts hide engine fans from radar
  • Gold-coated canopy reflects radar waves
• RAM (Radar-Absorbent Material):
  • Requires 8–12 hours of reapplication after heavy rain or sorties

💥 Armament & Payload

• Internal Weapons Bays:
  • Main Bay: 4× AIM-120 AMRAAM or 2× 1,000-lb JDAMs
  • Side Bays: 2× AIM-9 Sidewinder (or AIM-120C for 6× AMRAAM config)
• Hypothetical “Beast Mode” (non-stealthy):
  • 4× Underwing Hardpoints (theoretical capacity: 16× SDBs or 4× AMRAAMs + 2× fuel tanks)

📈 Performance Metrics (Classified Estimates)

• Instantaneous Turn Rate: 28–32°/sec (vs. F-35’s ~20°/sec)
• Sustained Turn Rate: ~15°/sec at Mach 0.9
• Alpha Limit: 60° AoA (tested to 90° in emergencies)

---

💰 Cost Analysis (2024 Adjusted Estimates)

Category	Cost	Notes
Flyaway Cost	150M(2009)→∗∗420M** (2024)	Inflation + tech refresh
Hourly Operating Cost	$85,000/hour	Stealth maintenance dominates
Mid-Life Upgrade (2030)	$50M per jet	New processors/EW systems

---

🚀 Hypothetical Modernized F-22X (Cancelled Proposals)

1. F-22B (Twin-Seat):
   • Planned for electronic warfare officers (canceled to save costs)
2. FB-22 Strike Bomber:
   • Delta-wing design, 12,000-lb payload (would’ve cost $250M/unit)
3. F-22N “Sea Raptor”:
   • Carrier-capable variant with reinforced landing gear (deemed too heavy)

---

🌍 F-22 vs. Peer Threats

Metric	F-22 Raptor	Su-57 Felon	Chengdu J-20
RCS	0.0001 m²	0.1–0.5 m² (estimated)	0.2–1.0 m² (estimated)
Supercruise	Mach 1.82+	Mach 1.3	Mach 1.5 (claimed)
Avionics	AN/APG-77 (AESA)	N036 Byelka (PESA)	Type 1475 (AESA)
Thrust Vectoring	2D (pitch-only)	3D (pitch/yaw/roll)	None

---

🔧 Maintenance Quirks

• “Stealth Coating” Reapplication: Requires climate-controlled hangars (humidity ruins RAM)
• Tires: Replaced every 15 landings due to high-stress vertical landings
• Coded Fuel: Uses JP-8+100 with anti-static additives for stealth

---

❓ Why Was Production Stopped?

• Cost: F-35 prioritized for multirole flexibility (80Mvs.150M+)
• Zero Export Customers: ITAR restrictions blocked sales to allies (Japan wanted F-22s)
• Overkill for 2000s Threats: No peer adversary justified fleet size

---

📜 F-22’s Legacy

• Kill Ratio: 108:0 in exercises (simulated vs. F-15s/F-16s)
• First 5th-Gen Fighter: Inspired J-20/Su-57 designs
• Future: Upgraded until 2060 with NGAD (Next-Gen Air Dominance) as successor

F-22 Raptor Avionics & Weapons Communication Buses: Technical Deep Dive

The F-22’s avionics architecture relies on high-speed digital buses to integrate sensors, weapons, and flight controls while maintaining stealth. Below is a breakdown of its key communication systems:

---

1. Avionics Network Architecture

The F-22 uses a federated but highly integrated system with multiple data buses for redundancy and security.

🔹 Primary Avionics Buses

Bus Type	Protocol	Speed	Function
MIL-STD-1553B	Command/Response	1 Mbps	Legacy systems (backup comms, some weapons)
Fibre Channel (FC-AE-1553)	Fiber-optic	1–2 Gbps	High-speed sensor fusion (radar, EW, targeting)
IEEE 1394b (FireWire)	Serial	800 Mbps	Mission computers, stores management
Proprietary High-Speed Bus	Classified	≥10 Gbps (est.)	Real-time sensor fusion (AESA radar, IRST, CNI)

Key Features:

• Fiber-Optic Dominance: Most critical systems use FC-AE-1553 (fiber-optic 1553) for low latency and EMI resistance.
• Stealth Constraints: No Wi-Fi or Bluetooth—all internal comms are hardwired to prevent emissions.
• Triple Redundancy: Three mission computers cross-check data to prevent single-point failures.

---

2. Weapons Integration & Communication

The F-22’s weapons bus ensures seamless coordination between internal bays and targeting systems.

🔹 Weapons Buses

System	Protocol	Function
Stores Management System (SMS)	MIL-STD-1760 (weapon interface)	Controls bomb release, missile initialization
Intra-Flight Data Link (IFDL)	Classified (TDMA-based)	Enables silent datalink between F-22s (no radio emissions)
AIM-120 AMRAAM Datalink	MIL-STD-1553 (mid-course updates)	Guides missiles via radar until active seeker takes over

Weapons Communication Flow:

1. Target Acquired (AESA radar/IRST locks on).
2. Mission Computer selects weapon (e.g., AIM-120).
3. SMS powers up missile, checks status via MIL-STD-1760.
4. Fire Control sends trajectory updates via 1553/FC-AE.
5. Missile Ejects (bay doors open for <1 sec to maintain stealth).

---

3. Sensor Fusion & Datalinks

The F-22 merges data from radar, EW, and off-board sensors into a single tactical picture.

🔹 Key Datalinks

Datalink	Type	Role
Intra-Flight Data Link (IFDL)	Secure, directional (LPI/LPD)	F-22-to-F-22 comms (no radio emissions)
Link 16 (Limited Use)	RF (UHF)	Only used in non-stealth mode (compromises RCS)
MADL (F-35 Compatibility)	Not native	F-22s must relay via gateway (e.g., F-35 or E-3 AWACS)

Sensor Fusion Process:

1. Radar (APG-77) detects target at 150+ nmi.
2. EW Suite (ALR-94) classifies threat (e.g., SAM site).
3. CNI (Communications/Nav/ID) fuses GPS/INS for precision.
4. Pilot’s Helmet-Mounted Display (HMD) shows integrated track.

---

4. Cyber & EW Hardening

• No Ethernet/Wi-Fi: Physically isolated to prevent hacking.
• Frequency Hopping: IFDL changes bands 500+ times/sec to avoid jamming.
• Optical Isolators: Prevent voltage spikes from frying avionics.

---

5. Comparison with F-35 & NGAD

Feature	F-22	F-35	NGAD (6th Gen)
Primary Bus	FC-AE-1553	TT Ethernet (GBit)	Optical AI Mesh (est.)
Weapons Control	MIL-STD-1760	MIL-STD-1760E	Smart Rail (AI-guided)
Datalink	IFDL (F-22 only)	MADL (multirole)	HBC (Hypersonic Black Comms)

---

❓ Why Can’t F-22 Talk to F-35 Directly?

• IFDL ≠ MADL: Different protocols (F-22 uses a closed, proprietary system).
• Stealth Trade-Off: Adding MADL would increase RCS.

---

🔧 Upgrade Potential

• F-22 Rampant Fury: 2024 EW upgrade (new jamming algorithms).
• AI Co-Pilot: Experimental AI aids in sensor fusion (DARPA tests).

F-22 Avionics & Weapons Buses: Cheat Sheet

1. Core Buses

• MIL-STD-1553B (1 Mbps):
  • Backs up weapons control (AIM-120 mid-course updates).
• Fibre Channel (FC-AE-1553, 2 Gbps)
  • Primary bus: Radar (APG-77), EW (ALR-94), and sensor fusion.
• IEEE 1394b (FireWire, 800 Mbps)
  • Links mission computers to stores management.

2. Weapons Integration

• MIL-STD-1760
  • Arms JDAMs/AMRAAMs; checks weapon health pre-launch.
• Launch Sequence:
  • Radar locks → SMS powers missile → Bay opens (<1 sec) → Ejects.

3. Stealth Comms

• IFDL (Intra-Flight Datalink)
  • LPI/LPD: F-22s share data without radio emissions.
• No Link 16/MADL in combat (breaks stealth).

4. Cyber Hardening

• Zero wireless (all fiber-optic).
• Triple-redundant computers cross-check data.

5. Weakness

• Can’t talk to F-35s directly (needs gateway like AWACS).

---

1. Intra-Flight Data Link (IFDL) – F-22 Raptor

Purpose:

• Secure, low-probability communication between F-22s only (no interoperability with other platforms).
• Maintains stealth by avoiding radio emissions.

Key Features:

• Protocol: Classified (likely TDMA-based with frequency hopping).
• Frequency: Estimated Ku-band (millimeter wave) for directional beams.
• Data Rate: ~10–50 Mbps (enough for radar tracks, target assignments).
• Stealth:
  • Beamforming: Tightly focused directional antennas (LPI/LPD).
  • No RF spillage: Shuts off if enemy intercept risk is detected.
• Range: ~50–100 nmi (line-of-sight limited).

Limitations:

• F-22 Exclusive: Cannot link with F-35s, AWACS, or ground units.
• No Mesh Networking: Only supports 4–8 aircraft in a “combat cloud.”

---

2. Multifunction Advanced Data Link (MADL) – F-35 Lightning II

Purpose:

• Multi-platform stealth networking (F-35s, ships, ground stations).

Key Features:

• Protocol: Time-Synchronized Mesh Network (TSMN).
• Frequency: Ka-band (directional, low-probability intercept).
• Data Rate: ~100 Mbps+ (supports video, sensor fusion).
• Stealth:
  • Adaptive beamforming: Antennas “blink” to avoid detection.
  • AES-256 encryption.
• Range: ~200 nmi (air-to-air).

Advantages Over IFDL:

• Interoperability: Talks to F-35s, Navy ships (via TTNT), and NATO allies.
• Scalability: Supports 50+ nodes in a network.

Limitations:

• Not F-22 Compatible: Requires a gateway (e.g., F-35 relay).

---

3. Hypersonic Black Comms (HBC) – NGAD/6th-Gen (Speculated)

Purpose:

• Survivable, hyper-fast datalink for NGAD, CCA drones, and space assets.

Theoretical Features:

• Protocol: Quantum-secured optical laser comms (air/space) + THz RF.
• Data Rate: 1–10 Gbps+ (real-time AI-driven sensor fusion).
• Stealth:
  • Zero RF mode: Laser-only in contested environments.
  • AI-driven jamming evasion.
• Range: Global (via satellite relays).

Expected Advantages:

• Hypersonic-speed updates: Guides HYCASM missiles at Mach 5+.
• Multi-domain fusion: Integrates space-based sensors.

---

Comparison Table

Feature	IFDL (F-22)	MADL (F-35)	HBC (NGAD)
Type	TDMA (RF)	TSMN (RF)	Optical + THz RF
Speed	10–50 Mbps	100 Mbps+	1–10 Gbps+
Stealth	LPI/LPD beamforming	Adaptive beamforming	Zero RF (laser)
Range	50–100 nmi	200 nmi	Global (sat-linked)
Nodes	4–8 F-22s	50+ F-35s/allies	100+ (NGAD/CCA/Sats)
Vulnerability	Jamming (if detected)	Limited EW resistance	Quantum-decryption

---

Key Takeaways

1. IFDL = Best for F-22-only stealth packs (but isolated).
2. MADL = Best for joint ops (but compromises F-22 stealth).
3. HBC = Future-proofed for AI-driven, multi-domain warfare.

---

Why the F-22 Can’t Use MADL

• Radar Cross-Section (RCS): MADL’s antennas would break F-22’s stealth shaping.
• Legacy Architecture: IFDL is hardwired into F-22’s avionics (no upgrade path).